In other words, what was the bet that she was making in the portfolio? Until an investor can answer that question, then it's impossible to know what to do with the stock.
What is your edge?
First of all, what constitutes properly diversification and what constitutes a "big bet"? For example, Avner Mandelman, writing in the Globe and Mail, believes that 15 to 20 stocks is enough for portfolio diversification. That may or may not be correct number. I refer you to my past post about Richard Grinold's Fundamental Law of Active Management:
The idea behind the Fundamental Law of Active Management is to size the bets according to the edge you have.In Mandelman's case, he has an investment process that is based on intensely focused fundamental research. Under those circumstances, you want to bet where his edge is, i.e. fundamental research, and a 15 to 20 stock portfolio may not be a bad idea. On the other hand, a top-down based investment process that picks sectors or countries needs a much larger number of positions in the portfolio because you want to diversify away the individual stock bets in the portfolio but concentrate the sector or country bets.
Returning to the question about what to do with the junior mining stock, my questions would be:
- Why did you buy it in the first place?
- What was the bet you wanted to make? How big a bet did you want it to be?