This paper assesses the macroeconomic effects of unconventional monetary policies by estimating a panel VAR with monthly data from eight advanced economies over a sample spanning the period since the onset of the global financial crisis. It finds that an exogenous increase in central bank balance sheets at the zero lower bound leads to a temporary rise in economic activity and consumer prices. The estimated output effects turn out to be qualitatively similar to the ones found in the literature on the effects of conventional monetary policy, while the impact on the price level is weaker and less persistent. Individual country results suggest that there are no major differences in the macroeconomic effects of unconventional monetary policies across countries, despite the heterogeneity of the measures that were taken.
Translation: The Fed may not necessarily be out of bullets. It just has to do something "unconventional" to expand its balance sheet. The effects were the same "despite the heterogeneity of the measures that were taken."
Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. ("Qwest"). This article is prepared by Mr. Hui as an outside business activity. As such, Qwest does not review or approve materials presented herein. The opinions and any recommendations expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Qwest.
None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this article constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or Mr. Hui may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.
1 comment:
Cam:the statement that the Fed must do something "unconventional" to positively impact employment is in stark contrast to a recent St.Louis Fed paper that noted:
"Little difference in economic performance during the past two decades…is consistent with the theoretical and empirical evidence that monetary policy has no permanent effect on real variables."
see: http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/es/article/9338
"The Efficacy of Monetary Policy: A Tale From Two Decades"
Their paper suggests the Fed is simply wasting money trying to effect the real economy. Cycnically I beleive the objective is not to help the economy but the financial institutions. But I'm a cynic.
Post a Comment