Showing posts with label gold stocks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gold stocks. Show all posts

Sunday, March 17, 2024

The stealth breakout you may have missed

Preface: Explaining our market timing models 
We maintain several market timing models, each with differing time horizons. The "Ultimate Market Timing Model" is a long-term market timing model based on the research outlined in our post, Building the ultimate market timing model. This model tends to generate only a handful of signals each decade.

The Trend Asset Allocation Model is an asset allocation model that applies trend-following principles based on the inputs of global stock and commodity prices. This model has a shorter time horizon and tends to turn over about 4-6 times a year. The performance and full details of a model portfolio based on the out-of-sample signals of the Trend Model can be found here.


My inner trader uses a trading model, which is a blend of price momentum (is the Trend Model becoming more bullish, or bearish?) and overbought/oversold extremes (don't buy if the trend is overbought, and vice versa). Subscribers receive real-time alerts of model changes, and a hypothetical trading record of the email alerts is updated weekly here. The hypothetical trading record of the trading model of the real-time alerts that began in March 2016 is shown below.


The latest signals of each model are as follows:

  • Ultimate market timing model: Buy equities (Last changed from “sell” on 28-Jul-2023)*
  • Trend Model signal: Bullish (Last changed from “neutral” on 28-Jul-2023)*
  • Trading model: Neutral (Last changed from “bullish” on 24-Jan-2024)*
* The performance chart and model readings have been delayed by a week out of respect to our paying subscribers.

Update schedule: I generally update model readings on my site on weekends. I am also on X/Twitter at @humblestudent. Subscribers receive real-time alerts of trading model changes, and a hypothetical trading record of those email alerts is shown here.

Subscribers can access the latest signal in real time here.
 

A convincing breakout at 2100

My recent publication highlighting the opportunity in gold mining stocks worked out better than expected (see How gold miners could be a refuge from the YOLO and FOMO frenzy). The gold miners’ ETF (GDX) is up slightly over 10% in under two weeks.

While GDX may be a little extended in the short run, I would like to point out the long-term potential in gold. Gold has staged a convincing upside breakout from a multi-month cup and handle formation. Moreover, the gold-to-S&P 500 ratio (bottom panel) is turning up from a multi-year saucer-shaped bottom, indicating the possible start of a new relative bull for gold over stocks. As well, the breakout has occurred with little fanfare as investors have been focused on AI and GLP-1 plays. This combination of breakout and lack of public participation suggests a substantial upside potential.

 
 The full post can be found here.

Monday, March 4, 2024

How gold miners could be a refuge from the YOLO and FOMO frenzy

I wrote yesterday that the stock market has been gripped by a YOLO (You Only Live Once) and FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) madness. I can suggest a possible refuge: gold and gold miners.

Gold prices recently made a fresh high last week, but the breakout was not decisive to be judged as unabashedly bullish for the yellow metal. The technical pattern was nevertheless highly constructive as it’s tracing out a possible cup and handle formation. In addition, the inflation expectations ETF (RINF), which measures 30-year bond market inflation expectations, is upward sloping and confirms gold’s uptrend.

 The full post can be found here.

Sunday, April 17, 2022

The canaries in a bifurcated coalmine

Preface: Explaining our market timing models 
We maintain several market timing models, each with differing time horizons. The "Ultimate Market Timing Model" is a long-term market timing model based on the research outlined in our post, Building the ultimate market timing model. This model tends to generate only a handful of signals each decade.

The Trend Asset Allocation Model is an asset allocation model that applies trend following principles based on the inputs of global stock and commodity price. This model has a shorter time horizon and tends to turn over about 4-6 times a year. The performance and full details of a model portfolio based on the out-of-sample signals of the Trend Model can bsoe found here.




My inner trader uses a trading model, which is a blend of price momentum (is the Trend Model becoming more bullish, or bearish?) and overbought/oversold extremes (don't buy if the trend is overbought, and vice versa). Subscribers receive real-time alerts of model changes, and a hypothetical trading record of the email alerts is updated weekly here. The hypothetical trading record of the trading model of the real-time alerts that began in March 2016 is shown below.



The latest signals of each model are as follows:
  • Ultimate market timing model: Buy equities*
  • Trend Model signal: Bearish*
  • Trading model: Bearish*
* The performance chart and model readings have been delayed by a week out of respect to our paying subscribers.

Update schedule: I generally update model readings on my site on weekends and tweet mid-week observations at @humblestudent. Subscribers receive real-time alerts of trading model changes, and a hypothetical trading record of those email alerts is shown here.

Subscribers can access the latest signal in real-time here.


A bifurcated market
As the S&P 500 struggles to hold its 50 dma, an unusual condition is occurring in the US equity market. The intermediate-term technical outlook is decidedly bearish, but the survey sentiment has reached a crowded short condition, which is contrarian bullish. This week, I offer some canaries in the coalmine as a way to resolve the wildly differing views of the market.



The full post can be found here.

Saturday, December 5, 2020

A focus on gold and oil

I received considerable feedback from last week's publication (see How to outperform by 50-250% over 2-3 years), mostly related to gold and energy stocks.


In last week's analysis, I had lumped these groups in with other cyclicals. Examining them further, I believe they have bright futures ahead of them.

The full post can be found here.


Monday, September 24, 2018

When should you buy gold?

Goldbugs got excited recently when the gold stock to gold ratio turned up sharply after the gold price consolidated sideways subsequent to breaking up from a downtrend. Past episodes have been bullish signals for bullion prices.



On the other hand, the front page of Barron's may also be a contrarian magazine cover bearish signal.


What should you do?

The full post can be found at our new site here.

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

A tale of two markets

Mid-week market update: It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. Stock prices continue to surge ahead, while the bond market *ahem* is having its difficulties.

The Dow Jones Industrials Average made another record high, followed by the Transportation Average. The combination of the dual all-time highs constitutes a Dow Theory buy signal.



By contrast, investors are fleeing the bond market. Moreover, the yield curve is steepening, which means two things. First, long dated yields are rising higher than short yields, which means that investors at the long end of the maturity curve got hurt more. In addition, a steepening yield curve has historically been the bond market's signal of better growth expectations.



How are we to interpret these differing patterns in stocks and bonds? Have stocks gone too far? Are bonds ready for a comeback?

The full post can be found at our new site here.

Monday, November 28, 2016

Too early to buy gold and gold stocks

The stars seem to be aligning for a revival in gold prices. Prices saw a nice bounce today as equities weakened. The trends in other asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, and the US Dollar, look very stretched in the short-term and poised to reverse. From an inter-market analyst viewpoint, gold also seems to be in that camp.

The chart of gold below tells the story. Bullion prices have been falling and they are oversold on RSI-14. The violation of key support at the 1205-1210 zone has prompted high volume selling, which is indicative of investor capitulation. From a technical perspective, gold prices are now testing a Fibonacci retracement level at 1170.


This seems to be a classic setup for a revival in gold prices. Not so fast! While gold prices may stage an oversold rally here, a durable bottom may not be in place just yet.

The full post can be found at our new site here.





Announcing our Black Friday/Anniversary promotion!
We are making a limited number of discounted annual subscriptions available at a price of US$199.99, which is US$50 off the regular price of US$249.99, for the first year. This offer is open to the first 100 subscribers, or until December 15, 2016, whichever comes first. Click on this link to subscribe and use the code anniversary2016 at checkout to get the discount.

Hurry before they're all gone!

Friday, June 20, 2014

Have we seen this golden movie before?

In recent days, the blogosphere has gotten excited about a potential turnaround in gold and gold stocks. Specifically, technicians have pointed to the rally in gold (top panel of chart), the gold stock to gold ratio (GDX/GLD, middle panel) and the better performance of high-beta silver to gold ratio. All of these point to better times for the bullion price.



The jury is still out
I wrote in a recent post that it is important to remain apolitical in investing (see Are you a good capitalist) and Barry Ritholz has also reiterated this theme in recent days as well. In that spirit, I want to analyze the excitement about the possible technical breakout in gold and gold stocks.

First of all, consider the chart above, but with a five-year time horizon. An examination of the longer term pattern shows that only the GDX/GLD ratio (middle panel) has staged a rally out of a relative downtrend and now displaying a sideways basing pattern.


The other two, namely gold and silver/gold ratio, are rallying up to test their long-term downtrends. A more bullish interpretation could be that these two ratios have rallied out of relative downtrend (dotted lines) and they are now consolidating sideways (shown in grey).

What about the dovish message from Janet Yellen? Could that not spark better performance for inflation hedges like gold?

Yes, but other charts of inflationary hedges have not confirmed the upside breakouts in gold and gold stocks. The relative performance of TIP to AGG (Barclays Aggregate Bond Index) shows that TIPS have started to turn around in relative performance against the bond market. However, we have not seen any signs of a breakout.


Similarly, the relative performance of metal and mining stocks (XME) against the SPX shows a similar pattern of a rally out of a relative downtrend, but XME remains in a sideways relative consolidation pattern.


In conclusion, the short-term outlook for gold is promising. However, with the golds having moved so far so fast, they are a little extended here. I would like to wait for more conclusive evidence of upside breakouts before jumping on the gold bull story.

So rant about the Janet-the-dove-Yellen and the Fed all you want. Wear the tinfoil hat if you want, but I would remind readers who are overly dogmatic about gold that the ultimate truth about being a gold bug can be found here.





Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. (“Qwest”). The opinions and any recommendations expressed in the blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions and recommendations of Qwest. Qwest reviews Mr. Hui’s blog to ensure it is connected with Mr. Hui’s obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with the blog’s readers.”

None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this blog constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or I may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

An intriguing pair trade

In the past week, I have seen commentary from various technical analysts indicating that gold stocks appeared to have bottomed and poised to rally. I took a look and concurred with the assessment. However, I feel slightly uneasy about going long gold stocks at this stage despite the positive technical backdrop because this group tends to be slightly negatively correlated to the stock market and the major averages have fallen very fast and very quickly in a very short time.

Further analysis of gold stocks also suggest that they may have rallied too far and have become overbought. So let me suggest a more risk-controlled way of playing the metal and hard asset rebound theme: Buy metal and mining and short gold miners:


The above chart of this pair (XME vs. GDX) shows that metal and mining stocks relative to gold stocks. With the exception of a brief period last August, XME has been in a steady relative uptrend since late 2012. Now that GDX has staged a relative rally, this relationship has settled back to the bottom of the range, this may be a fairly low-risk entry point for the long XME/short GDX trade.

Needless to say, if you were to put on such a trade, keep a tight stop in case gold stocks continue their relative rally.





Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. (“Qwest”). The opinions and any recommendations expressed in the blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions and recommendations of Qwest. Qwest reviews Mr. Hui’s blog to ensure it is connected with Mr. Hui’s obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with the blog’s readers.”

None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this blog constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or I may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Another sign of a short-term bottom

I recently wrote that gold and gold stocks could be setting up for a short-term trading bottom (see A bottom for gold and gold stocks?) and followed up with a post that the market may be seeing a short-term reversal at these levels (see The "Merde" rally?). Now comes another sign that a trade-able bottom in risky assets may be near.

The chart of the gold stock ETF GDX below shows that it experienced an outside day yesterday on high volume, which is an indication that we could be seeing signs of a trend reversal.


While there is still a high degree of headline risk, consensus sentiment is becoming overly bearish, which is contrarian bullish (see Mark Hulbert's article Major correction unlikely), and the stock market is now overpricing tail-risk in Europe. Notwithstanding the problems posed by Greece, the message from the bond markets of France, Italy and Spain is one of relative calm.

Who would you rather believe, the stock market or bond market?



Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. ("Qwest"). This article is prepared by Mr. Hui as an outside business activity. As such, Qwest does not review or approve materials presented herein. The opinions and any recommendations expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Qwest.

None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this article constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or Mr. Hui may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.

Monday, May 7, 2012

A bottom for gold and gold stocks?

Mark Hulbert wrote last week that his measures of gold timer sentiment was very washed out, which indicated the possibility of a bottom for gold and gold stocks soon:
Consider the average recommended gold market exposure among a subset of the shortest-term gold market timers tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest (as measured by the Hulbert Gold Newsletter Sentiment Index, or HGNSI).

When I wrote about gold sentiment two months ago, this average stood at 16.7%. Today, in contrast, it is at minus 14.8%, which means that the average gold timer is now allocating about a seventh of his gold-oriented portfolio to shorting the market.
Hulbert wrote that he hadn't seen these kinds of sentiment readings since March 2009:
In fact, except for a couple of days in late March when the HGNSI dropped marginally lower to minus 15.7%, its current level is the lowest it’s been since March 2009, more than three years ago.

And that’s really quite amazing, given that gold at that time was trading only slightly above $900 an ounce.
Does this mean that gold and gold stocks are set to bottom? Not yet, according to my long-term measures of greed and fear. Consider, for example, the silver-to-gold ratio. Silver has long been regarded as a high-beta play on gold. The chart below of this ratio shows that while sentiment has descended from levels indicating excessive bullishness, they are not at levels consistent with a long-term bottom yet.


Here in Canada, we also have a good measure of speculation levels in resource and junior resource stocks. The chart below shows the ratio of the TSX Venture Index, which is comprised mainly of junior resource companies, against the more senior and established TSX Composite. This relative return ratio also tells the story of falling speculative fever, but readings are not at levels consistent with capitulation bottoms. (Note that the scale of this chart is 13 years, which is the amount of history available, compared to the silver/gold ratio above that has a 20 year history.)


What about the ratio of gold stocks to gold? The chart below shows the HUI to gold bullion ratio.  While we are nearing levels where a meaningful bottom can be established, readings are not at screaming buy levels yet.


Mark Hulbert qualified his analysis with the following caveat [emphasis added]:

How long must traders wait for gold to begin to respond to these positive sentiment conditions? Assuming the market responds the way it typically has done in the past, the wait could be as much as several more weeks.

I say that because of econometric tests I have run on the HGNSI over the last three decades. Its greatest explanatory power in predicting the market’s subsequent direction existed at the three-month horizon.
These readings are suggestive of a tradable short-term bottom in gold and gold stocks is coming up, but a long or even intermediate term bottom may have to wait. Given that gold prices are deflating in the wake of the French and Greek elections, that short-term bottom may be fast approaching.

My inner trader tells me that I could buy here, but I need to carefully define how much risk I am willing to take. My inner investor tells me that there is value at current levels and I can accumulate positions, but there may be better entry points down the road.



Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. ("Qwest"). This article is prepared by Mr. Hui as an outside business activity. As such, Qwest does not review or approve materials presented herein. The opinions and any recommendations expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Qwest.

None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this article constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or Mr. Hui may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.




Monday, April 23, 2012

Not enough panic to buy yet

Now that we are nearly at support on the Spanish IBEX 35 Index, my inner trader tells me it's too early to be buying. We need to wait for more pain and panic to materialize. My inner investor says that signs of value are starting to show up in a number of natural resource sectors and it's time to start accumulating positions in resource cyclicals.


Spain a contrarian buy, but not yet
Soon after I wrote my last post (see Why I am buying the pain in Spain), Macro Man and I seemed to be on the same page when he wrote that Spain is unlikely to crash:
To TMM [ed. TMM=Team Macro Man] it would appear that the only scenario that supports selling right now is one where Spain crashes, doesn't receive assistance, defaults and the euro and then Europe break up. Now call us picky but though that indeed is one potential outcome there are a lot of other scenarios and most of them involve some internal resolve, even if it does involve printing your amount of money. Elections may change the leaders of some countries but as the UK Con/Lib coalition is finding out, they are but the tip of the iceberg of the machine that is government. There is enough mass below the waterline that knows where its true interests lie to stymie any threats to them. Yes Minister indeed.
In fact, they were piling into the Spanish trade:
Having piled back into equities last week the current mood should be considered as red flags to us and we really ought to run with the pack, chop the longs, swing short and whip up the doom. Instead though TMM have decided to do the reverse and have broken the glass on the cabinet containing their Kevlar Gloves and bought some Spanish stocks of international appearance ( braced for comments). Hold on tight !!
Recall that my original premise for buying Spain is to wait for a period of maximum pain and panic (see How much more pain in Spain?). The defining moment was the 2009 lows, which would be a level of technical support for Spain's IBEX 35 Index.


Now that we are nearly there, I don't think we've seen sufficient pain and panic in the markets for Spanish equities to be a contrarian buy yet. My inner trader thinks that TMM should be following his initial instincts to "run with the pack, chop the longs, swing short and whip up the doom."

Consider this chart of European stocks, which exhibited a break of an uptrend, but the index is not showing any signs of panic yet.


What about the euro? The EURUSD exchange rate is holding in nicely, thank you very much.


So are 10-year Treasury yields. No signs of panic there either.



Is the market about to hit an air pocket?
I am starting to see the signs of a change in leadership. While my Asset Inflation-Deflation Trend Model remains in at a weak neutral reading and I am not in the business of anticipating model reading changes, my best wild-eyed guess for the stock market is a gut-wrenching correction, followed by an explosive rally as the Bernanke Put and Draghi Put kicks in.

Consider the relative return charts below. The top chart shows the relative return of the Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index compared to the market. Cyclicals are underperforming and they have been in a relative downtrend after topping out in early February. By contrast, defensive sectors such as Consumer Staples and Utilities have been bottoming out relative to the market this year and recently started to outperform.


These are the signs of a change in leadership pointing to a deeper correction in stocks.


Value in resource sector
Despite the negative near-term prospect for cyclicals, I am seeing signs of value showing up in the deep cyclical sector, particular in the resource sector. Canada's Globe and Mail featured an article detailing that while energy companies were going like gangbusters:
Alberta’s oil patch is roaring. Oil prices are flying, pipelines are pumping millions of barrels a day, and companies are engaged in a rollicking spending spree.


Every 2½ weeks, companies shovel another billion dollars into oil sands projects. Drilling rigs across the province are tapping big new pools of oil. And firms desperate for skilled workers are scouring the globe to help them get on with ambitious growth plans. Western Canadian oil output is expected to surge by more than a third to 3.6 million barrels a day by 2018.
Their stockholders were missing out on the party:
Alberta’s energy frenzy has all the makings of a hollering rodeo party. But there’s one group conspicuously missing out on the action: investors.


In the midst of a boot-stomping boom, oil and gas has been among the country’s worst-performing sectors of the stock market. Since the global economic crisis, benchmark oil prices have soared from below $40 (U.S.) a barrel to above $100. Many Canadian energy stocks, however, have been left in the dust.
Indeed, this chart of the XOI, or Amex Oil Index, against the price of WTI shows that energy stocks are historically cheap against oil. Arguably, the graph doesn't show the true picture as XOI is shown against WTI, which has been trading at a discount to Brent, which is becoming the de facto benchmark for the world price of oil.


We see a similar picture with gold mining stocks. The Amex Gold Bugs Index, or HUI, is trading at a huge relative discount to gold bullion and the relative relationship is approaching the post-Lehman Crisis panic liquidation and capitulation lows.



The slope of the recent price action of the energy stock/oil and gold stock/gold ratio, however, tell the story of controlled selling rather than the panic selling that characterize a capitulation low. That's the same picture that I see in the IBEX 35, the Euro STOXX 50, Treasury bond yields and the EURUSD exchange rate.


A market crash is unlikely
Longer term, however, I expect that asset prices to be well-supported by the Bernanke Put and Draghi Put. Consider the Italian MIB Index as a bellwether of market fortunes. While there is downside risk, tail risk is likely to be mitigated by the Draghi Put and the near-by presence of major technical support that stretch back to the mid 1990's.


As the table below shows, this week is a big week for Spanish equity market, as most of the Spanish banks are expected to report earnings. Bad news could provide a catalyst for another downleg, which would be a set up for the good contrarian to start buying.



In summary, my inner trader tells me that there isn't enough panic here for him to step up to buy, but my inner investor, who has a longer time horizon, tells me that it's time to start nibbling away at long positions in distressed sectors, such as Spain and resource stocks, at current levels.



Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. ("Qwest"). This article is prepared by Mr. Hui as an outside business activity. As such, Qwest does not review or approve materials presented herein. The opinions and any recommendations expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Qwest.



None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this article constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or Mr. Hui may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.


Monday, September 5, 2011

One-eyed men (who would be kings)

As events turned south in Greece on Friday, the WSJ reported that a senior IMF economist expected a Greek default before March:
"I expect a hard default definitely before March, maybe this year, and it could come with this program review," said a senior IMF economist who is keeping close tabs on the situation. "The chances for a second program are slim."
Furthermore, the Greek bailout was dealt a blow as Angela Merkel's CDU was soundly defeated in local elections over the weekend.

As investors look for safe havens in a potential market panic, I am reminded of the adage, "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

Today, I see several metaphorical one-eyed men in this land of the blind that could serve as safe havens were there to be a market panic. All of them have significant flaws. In this post I would like to discuss them one by one.


US Treasury bonds
US Treasuries remain my favorite safe haven play and they have significant upside potential in the event of a market meltdown. The long Treasury ETF staged an upside breakout to all-time highs on Friday, surpassing the levels seen during the Lehman Crisis - a bullish sign.


My reservation about Treasury bonds is that the US has long-term fiscal problems. In such a case, can bonds be really a safe haven?


Gold
The price of gold has been on a tear since the market bottomed in March 2009.


Gold stocks staged an upside breakout to all-time highs on Friday, which I interpret as being bullish for bullion. Longer term, I still favor holding gold over gold stocks.


My principal reservation about gold is that it generally hasn't held up well in a market panic. It didn't during the Lehman Crisis of 2008. It sold off during the mini-panic earlier this year after the Japanese earthquake.

Despite what the gold-bugs say, gold and commodities have traditionally been part of the "risk-on" trade. In a "risk-off" market panic, risk managers and margin clerks control the market. They demand that traders and investors liquidate positions in order to meet their risk criteria and meet margin calls on all of their positions. That's why correlations converge to 1 during these market selloff episodes. One sign that I would watch for as a "tell" of a "margin clerk market" might be that gold stocks will de-couple from the price of gold. While gold may go up as a safe haven during such an episode, gold stocks may sell off because the risk managers regard them as stocks first and gold the alternative currency second.

In the current environment, I am inclined to give gold the benefit of the as a safe haven given its recent history of rising during this period of fear. I would not be inclined, however, to give the same benefit of doubt to other hard asset commodities. If there were to be a market selloff because of the fear of a recession or a banking crisis which would plunge the world into a global recession, don't you think that global demand for copper, oil and other economically sensitive commodities would fall as well?


Swiss Franc
The Swissie has been rising in the current environment of fear. As the chart below shows, CHF has been in a well-defined uptrend.


My reservations about the Swiss one-eyed man is twofold. Firstly, it didn't serve well as a safe haven during the crisis in 2008. Second, were Europe to blow up because of a banking crisis, does anyone really think that the Swiss banks won't escape collateral damage? Just look at this chart of Swiss bank asset to home country GDP exposure.


We want a vehicle that will hold up well in a market meltdown. The CHF strikes out in my book.

Incidentally, the Japanese Yen has also rallied during these turbulent periods and some investors have regarded JPY as a possible safe haven in a crisis. But I have observed how the BoJ (cough) "manages" JPY levels and there is too high a risk of intervention. JPY levels is overly "managed" in my book to qualify as a true safe haven in a crisis.


The winners are...
In summary, I would look at the following two vehicles as safe havens in a crisis (in order of preference):
  1. US Treasury bonds (long Treasuries if you want to be aggressive);
  2. Gold, but avoid gold stocks.
I would avoid currencies such as CHF and JPY because of specific problems connected with those countries or currencies.



Cam Hui is a portfolio manager at Qwest Investment Fund Management Ltd. ("Qwest"). This article is prepared by Mr. Hui as an outside business activity. As such, Qwest does not review or approve materials presented herein. The opinions and any recommendations expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Qwest.

None of the information or opinions expressed in this blog constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Nothing in this article constitutes investment advice and any recommendations that may be contained herein have not been based upon a consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Either Qwest or Mr. Hui may hold or control long or short positions in the securities or instruments mentioned.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Stop buying gold stocks!

Here we go again. Gold has hit all-time highs again. As you can see from the chart below, bullion remains in a well-defined uptrend.


On the other hand, gold mining stocks performance is disappointing as the group is struggling with technical resistance and has underperformed gold (again). What happened to the story about a better leverage to the gold price?


I wrote about this before here. Gold stocks are underperforming because their cost of production is going up, which creates a headwind for earnings - a driver of stock price. Yes, the value of what they have in the ground has gone up, but so has the cost of what it costs to take it out of the ground.

I wrote the following in December 2009 and it has proven to be true:
Supposing that you had a crystal ball that told you the price of gold were to triple within two years. Given this piece of information, what should you buy in order to maximize your gain?


Buying gold by itself will give you a gain of 200%. Buying a two-year call on gold with a $600 strike will give you a projected gain of about 300%. If you change the strike to $900, the projected gain is about 550%.

If you buy gold stocks given its poor fundamentals of rising production costs and their resultant pattern of disappointing leverage, gains are likely to be 200% or less. An investor would be taking on more volatility risk but at the price of little or no incremental gain.
If you are a gold bull you should either buy GLD or physical bullion, not gold stocks.



Thursday, December 17, 2009

Interview with Arjun Rudra

I was interviewed by Arjun Rudra of InvestingThesis.com, where I talked about my views on:
  • Gold stocks
  • Stock market valuation
  • Inflation and deflation macro trends
  • Peak Oil

You can read the interview here, Seeking Alpha.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Why you shouldn't buy gold stocks

My last post an embarassing question for gold bugs got a fair number of comments - which is to be expected whenever I write anything negative about gold or gold stocks.

My post then deserves a clarification. Supposing that you had a crystal ball that told you the price of gold were to triple within two years. Given this piece of information, what should you buy in order to maximize your gain?

Buying gold by itself will give you a gain of 200%. Buying a two-year call on gold with a $600 strike will give you a projected gain of about 300%. If you change the strike to $900, the projected gain is about 550%.

If you buy gold stocks given its poor fundamentals of rising production costs and their resultant pattern of disappointing leverage, gains are likely to be 200% or less. An investor would be taking on more volatility risk but at the price of little or no incremental gain.


Gold stocks are like leveraged ETFs
There are, however, times that gold stocks can be good trading vehicles. As many readers pointed out, they were a screaming buy compared to bullion early this year. Unfortunately, gold stocks are trading vehicles in the same way leveraged ETFs are trading vehicles. For longer term investors, their risk-reward characteristics are bound to disappoint.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

An embarassing question for gold bugs

Here is an embarrassing question for gold bugs. The chart below shows that price of gold decisively moved to all-time highs in early October, notwithstanding the recent pullback:



Meanwhile, the Amex Gold Bugs Index (HUI) barely challenged its old highs. What happened to the thesis that gold stocks are a levered play on the price of gold?



In case you thought I was cherry picking gold stock indices, the failure to make new highs is not exclusive to HUI, just look at XAU:



…and GDM, which is the base index for the GDX gold stock ETF:




Barry Sargent, writing at Mineweb, attributes the poor performance to the negative cash flows generated by the major gold miners:

Since the start of 2007 (and excluding the fourth quarter of 2009), eight of the world's Tier I gold stocks - AngloGold Ashanti, Barrick, Goldcorp, Newmont, Yamana, Kinross, Harmony, and Gold Fields - have generated negative free cash flow of USD 3.2bn (for the first nine months of this year, in line with rising bullion prices, generation of free cash flow has been positive to the tune of USD 1.1bn).

I believe that the story is simpler than that. I showed before that gold mines can be modeled as a series of call options on the gold price and production costs are rising at the major mining companies. Who knows, maybe the era of peak gold has arrived (see articles here and here).

I posted on this topic before and got a lot of hate mail for it. Now it’s time to revisit that issue again. For gold bulls who insist on a levered play on bullion, I would rather buy a long-dated deep in the money call option on gold than holding gold stocks.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

You have been warned more than once. Gold bugs have no one else to blame if they underperform if there is another upleg in gold prices.

Friday, September 18, 2009

The Moriarty warning on gold

When someone who is paid to be a rah-rah cheerleader on the precious metals turns cautious you have to sit up and take notice. Bob Moriarty of 321gold.com did just that last week:


Gold and silver are behaving well but they too, are overdone. You don't have to be 100% invested all of the time. If you have some profits, take some money off the table. If you don't have profits, you haven't been reading me for the last nine months.

We probably are not at exactly a trading top but we are pretty close. Better to sell a day early than a day late.

The last time he warned on gold was on March 7, 2008, just before the metal price fell apart. I pointed out the high risk condition and got a lot of hate mail for it.




This time, Barrick’s de-hedging program and equity issue may have been the signal to tactically turn cautious on the precious metal complex.

Nothing goes straight up. Be warned.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Is Barrick responsible for gold at $1,000?

Bespoke recently asked the question: Did Barrick jinx gold again?

Now we have the answer and it doesn't look pretty. Barrick's de-hedging program may have actually driven up the gold price with its buying, according to this report [emphasis mine]:

Dehedging by the world's largest gold producer, Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX), has been the driving force behind gold's move above $1,000 a troy ounce this week, a price level analysts say is unsustainable.

Barrick said late Tuesday that it will close its gold hedges at a total cost of $1.9 billion over the next 12-months...

"We have more buying to do," the Barrick spokesman said.

India's gold market, which is one of the largest sources of physical gold demand, is showing signs of lukewarm demand. What's more, I posted a few days ago that the US bond market could be poised for a rally. Could this rally in gold be the final capitulation of the bond bears (and conversely the gold bulls)?

I remain a long-term commodity bull, but nothing goes straight up. For the gold bugs who want to send me hate mail, I refer you to this.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Julian Robertson’s genius in the yield steepener trade

Recently I mentioned Julian Robertson’s yield steepener trade. The yield steepener, which is a bet on rising long Treasury rates, is a really a bet on rising inflationary expectations.

This trade demonstrates Robertson’s genius. For most investors, a bet on inflation means a bet on gold, or other commodities. Here is what Robertson had to say about gold:

While Julian certainly thinks inflation is in our future, he is hesitant to buy gold. In the Value Investor Insight interview, he goes on to say that, "I've never been particularly comfortable with gold as an investment. Once it's discovered none of it is used up, to the point where they take it out of cadavers' mouths. It's less a supply/demand situation and more a psychological one - better a psychiatrist to invest in gold than me."


The bond market is infinitely more liquid
Whether the statement about being a psychiatrist is true or not, I don't know. For people like Robertson who run large hedge funds, liquidity is a far bigger concern. While mere mortal like us play around with gold (including the likes of John Paulson). Robertson has moved onto the far more liquid U.S. Treasury market.

To give you an idea of the differences in scale, the U.S. debt clock shows the total U.S. debt outstanding to be roughly $11 trillion. By contrast, Federal Reserve holdings of gold bullion (assuming that it’s not encumbered by gold loans) amount to a little over $200b, even at today’s prices. If we were to look at gold stocks, the total market capitalization of components of the Amex Gold Bugs Index (HUI) total about $120b, which is roughly the market capitalization of Cisco Systems (CSCO).

Robertson has enormous investment capacity in this trade, compared to investors who just play gold and gold stocks.

Now that’s genius.